New municipal term of office not best idea


I am very concerned with the change of the
municipal term to four years.  I can
understand the argument that because the last year of a term is a lame duck
year, now you are wasting only one quarter of the term instead of one third but
do not agree with it.  This argument is
only true if you believe a year of listening to the public and trying to cater
to public opinion is a waste.  I thought
municipal government was supposed to be the most accessible and
responsive of all levels of government in Canada.  Isn’t municipal government supposed to be
about full, open public debate and full disclosure of all staff reports before
decision making?

The Minister of Municipal Affairs, in the
preamble to the paper announcing the change, states: “There are a number of
potential benefits to longer terms of office.  A four-year term offers
more time for a council or school board to forge an agenda, implement it, and
then seek the people’s judgment.  In addition, municipal councils and
school boards would have similar time horizons to those of federal and
provincial governments in which to plan for the community and implement those
plans.”  He goes on to state: “The
Association of Municipalities of Ontario and many municipalities have requested
for a number of years that the term of office for local government
representatives be extended. School board associations have also said they are
in

favour
of such reform. “

The potential benefits of 
a longer term of office are only realizable if there is also some
mechanism to  ensure that council
policies and decisions are truly made in the open, and that all opinions in the
municipality are given consideration and a chance to be heard.  The council must be large enough to represent
most of these opinions and there must be some way to recall a council if it
loses the confidence of  the local
municipality.  At the provincial and
federal levels, the government must resign if it looses the confidence of the legislature.
Municipal government affects us most directly; it should be at least as
accountable and responsible.

At the provincial level, decisions are often made in the
privacy of a secret cabinet meeting for which one can’t even get an agenda.
Cabinet ministers even swear oaths that they won’t reveal the public’s business
to the public. Reports that go to cabinet are automatically
labelled secret. Something similar can happen in the first two years
(soon to be three) of a municipal council. 
At the municipal level a small group of  long serving councilors can meet in closed
meetings and hash out all sorts of 
decisions and policies before discussing them in the open council meeting.
At the municipal level there is no elected opposition to question such tactics
and to bring such practices to public light. 
Furthermore, in most municipalities, the council just isn’t large enough
to represent all points of view in the municipality.  It is far too easy for say, developers to
elect a majority on council.
We must find tools for creating checks and balances
on councils in non-election years. We need citizen involvement in non-election
years to create clarity about the importance of 
local matters and local democracy, and we need to enhance the notion of citizenship
in our communities if the longer term is to work.

That longer term
also applies to municipal bodies like the public library board.  The Public Library Act states: “A board
member shall hold office for a term concurrent with the term of the appointing
council, or until a successor is appointed, and may be reappointed for one or
more further terms.”  Under the new term
of municipal office a potential library trustee is looking at possibly serving
for a minimum of four to eight years. 
Many public library boards are going to experience difficulty in
recruiting new board members because of this lengthy commitment. It becomes
even more important to get the public more involved in municipal
government.  Such involvement means 
supporting citizen groups that are  broad-based and giving people a voice,
creating a sense of community, and doing all this in a non-partisan manner. And
above all, ensuring that council, school board and library board meetings
remain open and responsive in non-election years.

About thebows99krug

Hi, I am Eric, a retired librarian. I was born in St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto and raised in the downtown area north of the Art Gallery, south of the University of Toronto. I went to Orde Street Public School, Harbord C.I., University College at the UofT and the UofT's Faculty of Library and Information Science. I meet my wife Patricia at FLIS; our first date was on November 15, 1968. We were engaged February 14, 1969 and married on June 21, 1969. Our family includes son, James; daughter-in-law, Erin; (both writers), grand-daughters, Vivian and Eleanor; and Sonic, a very friendly ginger tabby. My beloved wife died January 7, 2017 and our 19 year old cat Pooka died January 8, 2017. I would like to hear from any other class of '63 alumni of Harbord C.I. and class of '67 alumni of UofT's University College.
This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.